Author Topic: [CLOSED]AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart  (Read 1148 times)

(RIP) Ernst Weber

  • General group
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Honour: 0
[CLOSED]AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« on: 14 January, 2015, 09:14:42 PM »
By the power given to me by Our King and with sole intention to protect the order and follow the laws of Kingdom of Saxony, High Court by own initiative start this prosecution against crimes committed by Norwin Stormgart, subject of Kingdom of Saxony.

I give the ground to Prosecution represented by Martin Wagner, Chancellor of the Kingdom, to present accusation against the Defendant. This must be done in 24 hours.

For Defendant  24 hours are given to find a lawyer who will represent him in this session. If he fail to do so Defendant will must defend by himself.
« Last Edit: 20 January, 2015, 12:54:25 AM by Ernst Weber »

(RIP) Martin Wagner

  • General group
  • Baby Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Honour: 0
Re: AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« Reply #1 on: 15 January, 2015, 08:55:44 AM »
Your Honor,

To avoid problems previous judge has with court sesion performing because of incompetence and lack of knowladge abour court procedure I plad this court sesion to be proceded as example for strict following the rules.

I will also take freedom to answer some questions Defendants has about procedures, and ask you for pardon if you prefer to do so personaly.

As it is stated here: http://wiki.medieval-europe.eu/index.php?title=The_Trial there is a tree steps to open court procedure.

I. If so the Judge then opens that trial in the appropriate Kingdom Court of Law sub-forum.

It is done as we can see here.

II . He would then notify both the Defendant and the Prosecutor via PM of the trial along with a URL link to the pertinent trial post.

It is done. All accused receive a letter:

Quote
Subject: Call to court

Text: Dear Sir,

You are called to the court of Kiev to answer to accusation in violating of Saxony laws.

This is the link to the court session: (URL of court session)

This text is provided to us from our collegue from Kiev so there was a understandable copy-paste error with mentioning court of Kiev. But it is acceptable  because the main goal of letter is to inform accused about opened court session and providing hiwm with URL (something previous Judge fail to do according case archives)

III. Also the Judge of the Kingdom where the trial is taking place must use the in-game functions of the Court House building menu to create the Crime Procedure. In the form he needs to fill out:

    The name of the Defendant
    A summary of the crime(s) he is accused of
    The URL link to the Trial

Once submitted, the Judge can go back to the Court menu to view and administer the Crime Procedure.


All trials was opened in Court building in game. I dont know why defendants think that they must be visible for them, but if it so they must report to admin technical malfunction. Cases are opened in game in 10 minutes period after forum topics are created and administration can check and confirm it.

Now , your honor, I would like to plead for procedural issue. I see that you wish to combain two phases of court :

Quote
1: Starting the Trial:

The Judge starts the Trial. He must present the Defendant and the Prosecutor and ask them if they want to appoint an Attorney (Defense) or a Barrister (Prosecution).

The Defendant and the Prosecutor must declare if they want to appoint someone or not, and tell the Judge who they are appointing.
Also, if the Defendant and the Prosecutor can’t find lawyers and can’t speak the native language of the Judge or of the other Parts, they can ask to have a “Basic English” trial, so that it could be understood using common translating tools.
This whole step must be done within 24 hours from the Judge’s opening post.

and

Quote
2: Opening remarks by the Prosecution:

The Prosecution should open the trial with a presentation of the facts of the case, and a listing of what laws were broken by the Defendant. All evidence should be presented at this time and may take the form of a Screenshot (see sidebar).
The Prosecution can call up to two Witnesses, who will present their witness.
This whole step must be done within 24 hours from the Prosecutor post.

I ask you to not do so , as I say previously, because of my wish this court session to be an exemplar. I ask you for permision to have my 24 hours to present my accusation only after Defendant name his lawyer or state thet he will defend by himself.

I hope my plead will be accepted.


(RIP) Ernst Weber

  • General group
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Honour: 0
Re: AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« Reply #2 on: 16 January, 2015, 06:09:28 PM »
As the procedure was freezed by highest authority I will give to all defenders 6 more hours to name their lawyer if the want. If they dont court will expect from them to defend themselves.

(RIP) Ernst Weber

  • General group
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Honour: 0
Re: AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« Reply #3 on: 17 January, 2015, 12:40:53 AM »
By request of kind sir Kurt Hartman and with acceptance of the Prosecution, this Court decide that citizen Norwin Stormgart is too young to have anything to do with any last events and all vilatains he accused in can be justifyed as mistakes of the youth. So I close this trial and will order Norwin Stormgart to be reliesed from restrain as soon as it possible.

As compensation for inconvenience he will receive 100 sp.

(RIP) Götz v.Berlichingen

  • General group
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 122
  • Honour: 0
Re: AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« Reply #4 on: 19 January, 2015, 02:08:21 AM »
Dear Mr. 30-days-old-snooty-nosed-little-upstart Weber,
exactly the opposite is true!

We've been playing along for the sake of the game with your little charade of set-up trials until this point.
But this court has significantly violated proceedured all along these trials and I intended to present my charges to this court in my final speech. But since you insist on stretching the restrains way over every limit and keep prohibiting my person from orderly conducting my defence at every given chance I will request other institutions to put an end to this farce.

I accuse you of holding fake trials with no substance at all only to intimidate my clients and everybody involved.

I have carefully documented all your failures and those of the prosecution and will present them to the honorable masters of the Supreme Court to have you answer to them,  leaving it to their valued judgement to resolve these cases.

It's a pitty to watch you fail even on this level of the game but, to be blunt, noone was expecting any different from you to begin with.

sunchaser_general

  • Guest
Re: AZ: 1314/030 The people against Norwin Stormgart
« Reply #5 on: 19 January, 2015, 11:54:30 AM »
A letter arrives from Supreme Court:

"Judge has already decided that the citizen should be set free and get a compensation, please close this trial."